Newars Are Not Indigenous Nationality
Being the original inhabitants of the land is just one aspect of the terms ‘indigeneous’ or ‘adivasi’. The Newar people may perceive these terms in this manner only, but I am sure the Newar leaders know, as do the rest of the world, that these terms also indicate oppression, backwardness, and isolation, all of which have negative connotations. Could you therefore circulate the following revised write-up please?
“The training program that Ms Sumitra has been promoting is mainly about the indigeneous people of Australia. They are living in a wretched condition. Things are a bit better for the Maoris of New Zealand, but essentially they too are living like the Fourth World people in a First World country. I know this because I have been living in these two countries for more than ten years now.
I have noticed that Newar leaders and writers routinely refer to Newars as ‘indigeneous’ or ‘adivasi’ people. After the apex body of the Newar community, Newaah De Daboo joined Nepal Federation of Indegeneous Nationalities, Newars have literally become ‘indigeneous’ or ‘adivasi’ like the Raute or the Hayu communities. One of our top leaders, Malla K. Sundar has just accepted the Maoists’ nomination to the Interim Parliament as a representative of the indigeneous nationalities.
Newars in general may simply perceive the terms ‘indigeneous’ or ‘adivasi’ as the original inhabitants of Nepal or Nepal Mandal. However, I am sure the Newar leaders know, as well as the rest of the world do, that these terms also indicate oppression by the conquering people, living in isolation from other sections of the nation-state and economic backwardness, all of which have negative connotations. Indigeneous or adivasi people can’t help themselves and are therefore helped by other national and international organisations.
Newars are among the elites of Nepal, not an indigeneous people as our leaders want us to believe or as defined by international organisations such as the UN, ILO or the World Bank. Nobody else is calling us indigeneous people, except our own leaders who are possibly doing this out of self-pity or the ‘victim mentality’. Moreover, Newars share very few common issues with the indigeneous people of Nepal. Therefore, Newars have no reason to be a member of Nepal Federation of Indegeneous Nationalities.
Our leaders have been doing a great job by uniting a mixed community like ours by promoting Newaah Nationalism through Nepal Bhasha, Nepal Sambat, Newaah Culture etc. Can they stop calling ourselves indigeneous or adivasi, which we are not?”
Kind regards.
Uday Bajracharya
Sydney, Australia

yeah, this issue should be widely discussed and make Newar understand the ground reality.
Comment by Kumar Bajracharya — January 18, 2007 @ 8:49 pm
Agreed that the aspect of leadership representing Newah has always been subject to debate. Reasons? There are a group of elites who have different opinions about each others that has a smell of personal issues (should I term it ego?) beyond newah unity issues. The elite group have somehow missed to reach out to the bottom of the community as they successfully did to outdo the Rana and Panchayat system which at least promoted literatures if not local empowerment of the raised political issues. I’m not in a position to decide whether we should come out of the box of “indegenous” or to support the term for the approach towards political empowerment of newah community. But I can surely comment that the age now is not based on TOP DOWN approach of power/knowledge/information but the strength to face and uplift our needs in common through BOTTOM UP approach making all at the bottom citizen feel responsible for both progress and failures. In this context, the efforts of elite should also be into transformation of ideologies into younger generation. More should be done to encourage children and youth to know about our own identical culture with economic aspects broadening to fit their interests of self dependency. Otherwise, I feel, the future remains weak with youth attraction towards competency in global information and technologies for their career that promises more efficiency and self development than the identity of historical newars.
Comment by Rajesh — January 19, 2007 @ 7:11 am
yes, i agree with u. we, newar r not indigeneous people.there should b more discuss about ‘nepal mandal’.
Comment by babukaji shrestha — January 19, 2007 @ 5:07 pm
Isn’t this the same old topic, which has been discussed enough in various forums ? I don’t know what has inspired Uday to put arguments that are not new and appealing as well.
Comment by roshan — January 19, 2007 @ 10:58 pm
I do agree with the information as stated above.
1. I would appreciate if all the readers also refer - Time magazine of march, 2006 (forgot the issue no.) in which the origin of human being has been illustrated including the whites of Europeans, North America, and South America, with scientific logics.
Basically, the source of human being in all continents dates back to 12000 years from Asia.
So, the people of Nepal. The question is who settled first.
When we say Newars:
1. Based on language
2. Based on local culture
3. Based on ethnic background
4. Based on caste and creed, and race
But if a Nepalese immigrates to USA and after 10th generation or 15th generation, they do not know who they are and they are locally adapted and their native language and food is Engllish in this case.
In the case of Newar too, there are so many ethnic group within Newars who have immigrated and settled in Kathmandu, followed the sampel culture and tradition to adjust in society now called themselves as Newars.
Therefore, it is a complex issue. But personally, i do not consider Newars as the indigenous ethnic group, but I would rather say then as the citizens of First Nation.
However, I look forward to see comments.
Freedom Lover
Comment by Freedom-lover — January 20, 2007 @ 1:46 am
(posted on behalf of the sender)
Let me answer Roshanju’s enquiry as to what has inspired me to raise this issue at this stage.
Newaah De Daboo joined Nepal Federation of Indigenous Nationalities NEFIN despite having very few common issues with indigenous nationalities of Nepal. For instance, illiteracy and poverty are the main issues for them while they are non-issues for us because we have the highest literacy rate in Nepal and are relatively well off compared to other sections of the society. Caste system is a non-issue for them while it is a BIG issue for us. The language issue is a top priority for us but they don’t seem to mind much about it.
I firmly believe that continuing our current policy on indigenous nationalities could seriously hinder our progress in the changed political context of Nepal.
For instance, Nepal has finally been declared a secular state but some of our leaders joined other NEFIN members to burn certain sections of the Interim Constitution because the cow has been maintained the national animal and that some indigenous nationalities ate cow’s meat! Secularism is not anti-Hinduism and we need to be sensitive to others’ sentiments. (See my article, “Defending Secularism in Nepal”, eKantipur 29 May 2006). Such acts could destroy the religious harmony that we Newars have been enjoying for so many centuries.
Newars are on their way to ethnic autonomy in Nepal Mandal. The recently concluded Brihat Newaah Ganataantrik Sabhaa is an example of our progress on this. Most NEFIN members, barring a few, are not yet ready for such action. Dragging them along can seriously affect our own movement towards Ganatantra and Jaatiya Swashaasan.
NEFIN has just announced a two-week long agitation against the Interim Constitution. Such actions could not only help the forces of regression but our affiliation with it could seriously damage our credibility in the current national politics. Our leaders should therefore reconsider our relationship with NEFIN Now!”
Kind regards.
Uday Bajracharya
Comment by nesoca — January 21, 2007 @ 5:18 pm